Mrs Dalloway

Virginia Woolf was a Modernist writer born in 1882 in Kensington. She was raised by wealthy and liberal parents who had many social and artistic connections. However, she experienced the loss of her parents and a sibling early in her life, and she dealt with severe mental health issues as she continued her education and expanded her worldview.

Soon after her father’s death, Woolf and two of her siblings moved to Bloomsbury and started to move in the same circles as several free-thinking intellectuals and artists. Together, they were known as the Bloomsbury Group; they met to critique ideas and raise questions about the world. Those who were a part of it are some of the most acclaimed people, such as Robert Fry, E.M Forster, Clive Bell, John Maynard Keyes, and Vanessa Bell. They often had opposing views but salons have a tendency to encourage one to think out of the box.

What’s in a Name?

I think that the title of the novel Mrs Dalloway is an important element to deconstruct. While it is obvious that the central character of the novel is Clarissa Dalloway, there are several nuances at play. Firstly, it indicates that Clarissa chose Richard Dalloway over Peter Walsh. Additionally, marrying Mr Dalloway shows the importance she places on maintaining her position in society. The usage of ‘Mrs’ over ‘Clarissa’ points to the position of women in the same society. While she may run in upper-class circles, at the end of the day, no one is unaffected by the patriarchy and will always be associated with her husband. This includes the way she identifies herself with her husband. The themes of women being oppressed under the system as well as class tensions are therefore addressed in the title.

My River Runs to Thee

To me, one of the most distinctive features of the novel is the writing style. Mrs Dalloway provided a stark contrast against the conventional Victorian structure, which had well-developed plots and a linear form of storytelling. Woolf employed a technique called the ‘stream of consciousness, which gives the reader an insight into the inner workings of the characters over one day. The stream of consciousness captures the natural flow of thought because it is not linear, the text and syntax are not grammatically correct and the characters often jump from thinking about one thing to another. For example, in this excerpt:

All India lay behind him; plains, mountains; epidemics of cholera; a district twice as big as Ireland; decisions he had come to alone—he, Peter Walsh; who was now really for the first time in his life, in love. Clarissa had grown hard, he thought; and a trifle sentimental into the bargain, he suspected, looking at the great motor-cars capable of doing—how many miles on how many gallons? For he had a turn for mechanics; had invented a plough in his district, had ordered wheel-barrows from England, but the coolies wouldn't use them, all of which Clarissa knew nothing whatsoever about (Woolf, 35).

This technique is modernist in nature because it breaks away from regular prose, puts an immense amount of focus on the individual, and is disjointed. Peter Walsh’s thoughts move from geography to Clarissa to cars and back to Clarissa. The associative nature of these thoughts mimics the actual process and makes the reader feel like they are in the character’s mind. It gives the reader a more intimate experience while also helping them understand the character better.

Let Us Sleep Now

Published in 1925, a few years after the first World War, the book captures the thoughts of those living in a post-war London. While some of the characters look at the past, others ponder over a bleak future. Richard, Clarissa, Septimus and Peter all seem to be patriots. In the 19th Century, the British Empire dominated the world and its fall had a deep impact on the nation as well as its citizens. Their pride was hurt and they desperately clung to the times they showed their might. This is seen as Richard attempts to preserve the legacy of the Burtons.

The characters also seem hyper-aware of death. They recall traumatic events of the past, deaths they have experienced, the fleeting nature of their mortality and the fact that they lived through the war. Whether Clarissa looks at blooming floors and also when she looks at her own ageing reflection, the thoughts invade her mind. It is interesting to note how people belonging to the crème de la crème cope with such feelings post-war since they seem impervious to the effects of war. They live in fear of death, as though they are constantly in danger. To me, the toll of Big Ben every hour adds an ominous and dark element that complements the characters’ feelings. Septimus, in contrast, decides to take fate into his own hands. He would rather preserve his soul by taking his own life than wait out another miserable day. I felt like Septimus was the most intense character in the novel. It was difficult to read the section where he takes his own life. The calm that seemed to settle over him as he became lucid, the light-hearted conversation he had with his wife, a flippant comment he made asking her to destroy his thoughts-- they all seem exceedingly normal. It is hard to imagine this situation and it hurts to empathize with the character. The war shattered him and left him empty. The following excerpt, from one of his last moments, shows how fond he was of Rezia. He adored her and took it all in before he ended his life.

She held her hands to her head, waiting for him to say did he like the

hat or not, and as she sat there, waiting, looking down, he could feel her

mind, like a bird, falling from branch to branch, and always alighting,

quite rightly; he could follow her mind, as she sat there in one of those

loose lax poses that came to her naturally and, if he should say anything,

at once she smiled, like a bird alighting with all its claws firm upon the

bough.

Clarissa had a complex reaction to Septimus’ death. Initially, she dismissed it because she did not think that the topic should be brought up at her party. However, she soon begins to understand why Septimus did what he did. She understood wanting the embrace of death and felt that it was a form of defiance and communication. Later that night, when she looks at the elderly woman getting ready for bed, she reflects on the fact that she felt very much like Septimus. Perhaps, in the old woman, she saw her future as a hollow, domesticated being who felt alone. In a sense, she found some closure in his death. So how is she able to brush it off? Why must she keep up the appearance of porcelain that does not crack? Why does Septimus feel his emotions in all their glory, while she suppresses hers? Why is she okay with surviving in a world that she hates? Why is she in a constant state of denial?

We spend a considerable amount of time thinking about these themes and the roles they play in our lives. But we rarely think about our role in creating and contributing to the structures that seem to stifle and suffocate us.  As Septimus put it, “Only human beings—what did they want?”